THIS BLOG HAS BEEN MOVED

After looking at the different options available to me for blogs, I have decided to move my blog to wordpress.

This is the new link:
http://chelseydea.wordpress.com/

Entry Three

Part One:

What makes a good question? That’s a good question. I think that a good question is something that has an answer, but it isn’t set in stone. A good question is something that makes someone think about things, it makes them connect things in ways they hadn’t before. I think a good question can have many answers, each person with a different one. My central question would be something along the lines of this: Are alternative means to education beneficial enough to ignore what they cost, and put them into place? My answer would be a big, indisputable YES.

Why? There are so many reasons they are beneficial.

-         Cost effective (for the student)

-         Student grades improve

-         Graduation rate increases

-         Offers support they don’t otherwise have

-         Teaches children responsibility

-         Helps them achieve their dreams.

Why are these beneficial?
Because these are just starting points. One, for example, would be that it is cost effective for the student. It’s no secret that our economy isn’t at its peak. I don’t care if anyone says we are out of the recession. It’s just something we have to deal with. The cost of education is at its highest, and we can’t keep ignoring that. When a student enrolls in running start, it is taking the money normally used for their high school education and spending it on their tuition at a community college in their area. Because of this, students spend significantly less on a beginning college education. This, in turn, makes it easier for students to pay for a university after high school is over, and after they earn a transfer degree. This, in turn, makes them less likely to have a lot of debt, and more likely to spend money, stimulating the economy.

Part Two:

Using field research (surveys, interviews, observations) is something I plan to do for my final paper. I am excited about this already. From the survey I posted to the discussion board in my online class, I have had 6 people respond. It isn’t a lot, but it is enough to show me that a lot of students in my class are leaning toward my perspective.

I am going to be using the CEO program at Bellevue College for a lot of my argument. I won’t go into explaining what it is right now, but I will definitely be doing that in my paper. Because there aren’t any peer reviewed journals about the CEO program, all of my information will have to come from a reliable source. Luckily, I know just the people. I am very close with all of the staff running the CEO program, lucky for me. I am going to interview, not only the program manager, Glenn Jackson, but also,  CEO instructors Lori smith-Berry, Paul Whiteman, and Linda Flory-Barnes.

I am very excited about the field research aspect of my paper.

Entry Two - Counter Argument

Part one

After I researched the counter argument, I found that there was note very much information on career academies at all. Because of my conference, I was able to switch my topic to Alternative education options. This was a very big change, not only because it broadened my topic, making it easier to find information, and shape my paper into something more sectional, but it also made it much easier to research. Because there are so many alternative options, I have to choose which ones I would like to explore. These may include, but are not limited to: Running start, CEO, career academies, alternative high schools, schools for the visual and performing arts, boarding schools, charter schools, home school systems, and technical training programs. 

Because I have so many options, I can choose to graze over many of them, or go in depth for a few of them. No matter what, I have more options to explore than I did before I wrote my counter argument.

My point for my counter argument is that teenagers already have high school available to them, so it does not make sense that we spend money on programs for these students. It is a very valid point. High school students already have an education opportunity available to them, but high school is not something that works for everyone. The majority of students that go through high school have struggles. Only around 75 percent of students in the united states graduated high school in 2008. There is obviously some gap in the education system, and we need to figure out how to plug this hole.

Part two

I got an article titled “Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges” on Ebscohost, a database available at Bellevue College. This was written by the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. This board is made up of nine people selected by the governor to provide leadership and coordination for Washington state’s community and technical colleges. In this report, the board explains the statistics provided for Running Start students. All 34 community and technical colleges in Washington state offer Running Start. The percentage of high school students that take advantage of this opportunity is 10%. On average, students involved in Running Start that went to the University of Washington earned a higher GPA than students who didn’t participate in Running Start.

This raised many questions for me. I am wondering if it is a good idea to just focus on Washington state in my paper, because that’s the only state I could find information on for Running Start. The CEO program is also only offered in Washington state too. I wouldn’t be able to use my information on career academies, but because there isn’t a lot of information on them anyway, it wouldn’t completely hinder me.